Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Charanjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

Charanjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

(High Court Of Punjab And Haryana)

CWP 4343 of 2022 (O&M) | 07-03-2022

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J.

1. The petitioner has come up in this civil writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a prayer by way of writ of mandamus directing the respondents No. 4 and 5 to pay the gratuity, arrears of salary etc. to the petitioner as he has retired from service on 30.06.2018 alongwith interest @ 18% per annum, for which, legal notice dated 14.08.2019 (Annexure P-4) has also been served upon the respondent-authorities.

2. Heard.

3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, the directions are issued to the respondent-authorities to duly consider the legal notice dated 14.08.2019 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, preferably, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. If the petitioner is held entitled for so claimed relief and there is no impediment for granting the same, the relief be released to him without any delay.

5. Disposed off.

Advocate List
  • Mr. A.S. Pannu, Advocate

Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Eq Citations
  • NON-REPORTABLE
  • LQ/PunjHC/2022/9964
Head Note

Labour Law — Gratuity — Delay in payment of gratuity — Respondent authorities directed to duly consider legal notice of petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law