Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Burger King Corporation v. Swapnil Patil & Ors

Burger King Corporation v. Swapnil Patil & Ors

(High Court Of Delhi)

CS(COMM) 303/2022 & I.As.17896/2023 | 15-09-2023

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

I.A.17896/2023 & 17923/2023

2. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff- Burger King Corporation seeking protection of its marks ‘BURGER KING’ and also the Crescent Logo Design and Hamburger Refresh Design Logo. The claim of the Plaintiffs is that some of the Defendants are offering fake franchises under the Burger King Trade Mark to unsuspecting persons, and duping them of large sums of money. The said logos are set out below:

Crescent Logo Design

Hamburger Refresh Design Logo

3. Vide order dated 17th August, 2023, this Court has directed the Cyber Crime Division, Mumbai police to conduct investigation in accordance with law and take all necessary action in respect of the fraudulent activities being undertaken by various nefarious websites.

4. The present two applications have been filed by the Plaintiff seeking further orders in respect of fake, illegal and fraudulent websites using the name ‘Burger King’ in an unauthorised manner. After the filing of the applications and during the court proceedings, another domain name has also been brought to the notice of the Court. Thus, the Court is taking into consideration the said illegal domain names, which are as under:

i. www.burgerkingind.co.in as also the attached email address and bank account

ii. www.burgerkingfranchisee.com

5. The Court has heard ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff. Clearly there is a need to take stringent action as the application reveals that there is misuse of the domain names. Considering that the Delhi Police would need to investigate this matter, Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ld. ASC, has been requested to accept notice.

6. The interim injunctions have already been passed by this Court recognising the Plaintiff’s right in the mark ‘BURGER KING’ vide order dated 10th May, 2022 and subsequent orders extending the same to other domain names. The domain names, which have been already injuncted/blocked have been set out in paragraph 10 of the application. The Plaintiff has, however, come across further defrauding by unknown persons and using the above two domain names. Specifically, it has been revealed that some unsuspecting consumer who wanted to obtain a Burger King franchise have paid a sum of Rs.2,65,000/- to the bank account of the domain name at serial no. (i) i.e. www.burgerkingind.co.in. The said bank account details are as under:

Name

Burger King India Limited

Account Number

60449688238

IFSC Code

MAHB0000311

Branch

West Andheri

Bank

Bank of Maharashtra

7. In addition, the email being used for the fraudulent activity is info@burgerkingind.co.in. The Domain Name Registrar of this website is GoDaddy LLC and the DNR of the website www.burgerkingfranchisee.com is FastDomain Inc.

8. All these domain names and websites, as well as the bank accounts operated through these domain names, which are being used to fraudulently collect money under the name of the Plaintiff by misusing the Plaintiff’s brand and marks. It is accordingly deemed appropriate to extend the injunction order dated 10th May, 2022 to cover these domain names. There is an urgent need to stop any further amounts being received in these fraudulent bank accounts.

9. Accordingly, the following directions are being issued:

(i) Accordingly, an interim injunction is granted restraining www.burgerkingind.co.in and www.burgerkingfranchisee.com from in any manner using the mark/name BURGER KING or the logos extracted above, for any purpose, including for collecting moneys under the garb of issuing franchises, dealerships etc.

(ii) GoDaddy.com LLC shall, with immediate effect, suspend/block the domain name www.burgerkingind.co.in thereby ensuring that the website is no longer accessible to any consumers.

(iii) If the email address info@burgerkingind.co.in is opened by or through GoDaddy.com LLC, the said email shall also be blocked.

(iv) FastDomain Inc shall, with immediate effect suspend/block the domain name www.burgerkingfranchisee.com thereby ensuring that the website is no longer accessible to any consumers. If any email addresses are opened through the DNR- FastDomain Inc, the said email addresses shall also be blocked.

(v) NIXI is also directed not to permit any domain name/website to be opened under the ‘.co.in’ or ‘.in’ extensions consisting of the mark `Burgerking’, where the words ‘BURGER’ and ‘KING’ appear together.

(vi) The bank account number 60449688238 opened through the West Andheri branch of Bank of Maharashtra shall be frozen with immediate effect and the complete statement of the said bank account shall be placed on record by the Bank of Maharashtra. The concerned Headquarters of the Bank of Maharashtra shall also investigate as to how a bank account in the name of `Burger Kind India Pvt Ltd’ has been permitted to be opened, without verifying the credentials.

(vii) The Cyber Cell/IFSO Delhi Police is allowed to investigate the following mobile numbers and take action in accordance with law:

S. No.

Mobile Number

Telecom Service Provider

1

9038343545

Bharti Airtel Limited

2

9875572536

Reliance Infocomm Limited

3

9385983270

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

(viii) DoT and MeitY shall issue blocking orders qua the above domain names/websites with immediate effect. The same shall be given effect to by all ISPs.

(ix) Bank of Maharashtra is directed to disclose the identity of the account holder, KYC details and any other documents, which it may have.

(x) A Mareva injunction is granted for freezing the said bank accounts.

(xi) The Delhi Police shall obtain all the CDR records from the respective telecom service providers, namely Bharti Airtel, Reliance InfoComm Ltd., Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and investigate into the matter. All action in accordance with law shall be taken against the persons who are involved in this illegal and unlawful activity. If a FIR needs to be registered, the same may also be done. Delhi Police to place a status report in respect of the same by the next date of hearing.

10. For the reasons contained in the application, the application under Order I Rule 10 CPC is allowed. The amended memo of parties is taken on record. Let the same be placed in the main pleadings so that it is accessible to the Court. I.A.17896/2023 and I.A.17923/2023 are disposed of in the above terms.

11. Compliance of Order XXXIX Rule 3 shall be made within one week by email.

12. List on 27th September, 2023, the date already fixed.

13. Copies of the present order be communicated by the Registry to the following entities/persons:

S. No. Entity Person and/or Contact details

1.

Bank of Maharashtra

Mr. V.K. Gupta, Standing Counsel

(Email: vinodgupta501@hotmail.com

Mob. No.: 9582206578)

2.

Bharti Airtel

(E-mail: compliance.officer@bharti.in)

3.

Reliance Infocom

(E-mail: grievance.officer@jio.com)

4.

BSNL

Mr. Sameer Agarwal, Advocate

(E-mail: sameer.lawyer@gmail.com

Mob. No.: 9873405405, 9810047285)

5.

DOT

Mr. Harish V. Shankar, CGSC

(E-mail: hvscgscdhc@gmail.com

Mob. No.: 9810788606)

(E-mail: cyberlaw-legal@meity.gov.in and adg2ds-dot@gov.in)

6.

MeitY

7.

GoDaddy LLC

Ms. Shweta Sahu, Advocate

(E-mail: godaddylitigation.nda@nishithdesai.com

Mob. No.: 9004057125)

8.

FastDomain Inc.

(E-mail: legal@fastdomain.com)

9.

National Internet Exchange of India (E-mail: info@nixi.in)

Advocate List
  • Mr. Mukul Kochhar and Mr. Raunaq Kamath, Advocates

  • Ms Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC Ms. Shweta Sahu & Mr. Brijesh Ujjainwal, Advs.

Bench
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Eq Citations
  • 2023/DHC/6732
  • LQ/DelHC/2023/5359
Head Note

Case Name: Burger King Corporation & Ors. vs. Gratia Grata Hospitality & Ors. Court: Delhi High Court Citation: CS(COMM) 180/2022 1. Plaintiff, Burger King Corporation, sought protection for its trademark 'BURGER KING', the Crescent Logo Design, and the Hamburger Refresh Design Logo. 2. Burger King alleged that certain defendants were engaging in fake franchising, deceptively offering franchises to unsuspecting individuals and collecting large sums of money. 3. The Court granted interim injunctions restraining the defendants from using the Burger King trademark or logos for any purpose, including collecting funds under the guise of issuing franchises. 4. The Court directed GoDaddy LLC and FastDomain Inc., the domain registrars, to immediately suspend/block the fraudulent websites www.burgerkingind.co.in and www.burgerkingfranchisee.com. 5. NIXI was directed not to permit any domain name or website under the '.co.in' or '.in' extensions containing the mark 'Burgerking', where the words 'BURGER' and 'KING' appear together. 6. The Court froze bank account number 60449688238, operated through the West Andheri branch of Bank of Maharashtra, and directed the bank to submit a complete statement of the account. 7. The Cyber Cell/IFSO Delhi Police was authorized to investigate the fraudulent activity and take action against those involved. 8. The Court issued a Mareva injunction to freeze the bank account involved in the fraud. 9. The Court also directed the Delhi Police to obtain CDR records and register a FIR, if necessary, against those involved in the illegal activity. 10. The Court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the name or mark BURGER KING or any of the Plaintiff's logo designs and trademarks in any manner. 11. The Court issued directions to the entities involved, including domain registrars, banks, telecom service providers, and government authorities, to assist in the investigation and take appropriate action to curb the fraudulent activities.