Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Bhim Singh v. Union Of India & Others

Bhim Singh v. Union Of India & Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 310 Of 2005 With Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 82 Of 2010, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 94 Of 2008 | 05-04-2011

R.M. Lodha, J.

Crl.M.P. No. 10428/2010:

1. In some of the cases transferred out of the State of Jammu & Kashmir for trial pursuant to this Courts order dated November 10, 2008, a request is made by some of the accused, who are Indian nationals, to transfer back those cases to the respective courts in Jammu & Kashmir in view of the hardship faced by them in effectively defending themselves in courts outside the State. On this issue, affidavits have been filed on behalf of the State of Jammu & Kashmir. In the last affidavit filed on March 12, 2011, it is stated that in compliance with the earlier order passed by the Court, the records of all those cases have already been transferred to the respective courts where this Court directed the trials to be held. Nevertheless, the State expresses its readiness to hold trials of those cases at a suitable place in the State itself in case this Court so directs.

2. We would like to take a final decision on this matter after examining it on a case-to-case basis and also on getting the views of the State Government, through the Home Secretary.

3. We, accordingly, wish the Advocate General and the Home Secretary of the State of Jammu & Kashmir to be personally present when we take up this matter on the next date.

W.P. (Crl.) No. 310/2005 W.P. (Crl.) No. 82/2010 W.P. (Crl.) No. 94/2008

4. Mr. Parag Tripathi, learned Addl. Solicitor General states that all the foreign-national detainees, whose lists were furnished to this Court in different writ petitions/ Crl.M.Ps., excepting 29, have by now been repatriated. Out of the 29, who continue to be in Indian jails, 21 are under-trials, 3 are undergoing sentences and 5 are awaiting the establishment of their nationality and travel documents from their home country.

5. On the next date, the learned Addl. Solicitor General will give the detailed breakup in regard to the 29 detainees who continue to remain in Indian prisons.

6. Put up on May 04, 2011.

Advocate List
  • For the Petitioners Prof. Bhim Singh (In-person), P.V. Yogeshwaran, B.S. Bilowria, Gaurav Kumar Bansal, Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate Ms. Jayshree Satpute, Jyoti Mendiratta and Ms. Alim, Advocates. For the Respondents Parag Tripathi, ASG Brijender Chahar, Sr. Advocate, Binu Tampta, Anand Verma, Shadam Farasat, for S.N. Terdal, (NP), Divyesh Pratap Singh, for Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, (NP), Mukesh Verma, C.K. Sharma, for Anil Katiyar, (NP), Jayshree Anand, AAG, Ekta Singh, Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Shail K. Dwivedi, AAG Pradeep Mishra, Archana Pathak Dave, for Milind Kumar, Sunil Fernandes, Suhaas Joshi, Astha Sharma, Advocates.
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA
Eq Citations
  • 2012 (2) SCALE 434
  • (2012) 13 SCC 475
  • LQ/SC/2011/502
Head Note

Constitution of India — Arts. 136 and 32 — PIL — Foreign nationals detained in Indian jails — Status of — Status of 29 detainees who continue to remain in Indian prisons — Detailed breakup to be given by next date — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S. 436