Bharat Trading Company v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Bharat Trading Company v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Writ Petition (C) No. 9982 of 1983 | 31-03-1992

The short question that arises for our consideration in this case is whether 'Raskat' which is an inferior quality of 'Gur' could be held to be an agricultural produce within the meaning of Section 2 (a) U. P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964. Having regard to the fact that it is nothing more than an inferior quality of 'Gum' applying Rethought Khandsari Udyog v. State of U. P. and Kishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan we hold it as an agricultural produce. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE G. N. RAY
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE S. MOHAN
Eq Citations
  • (1993) SUPPL. 3 SCC 361
  • (1993) 2 UPLBEC 870
  • 1993 RD 171
  • 1993 (1) SCALE 615
  • LQ/SC/1992/293
Head Note

Agricultural Produce, Livestock and Fishery Products Marketing and Processing Cess Act, 1966 — S. 2(a) — Agricultural produce — 'Raskat', inferior quality of 'Gur' — Held, is an agricultural produce — U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 — S. 2(a) —