Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai
v.
State Of Gujarat
(Supreme Court Of India)
Criminal Appeal No. 554 Of 1999 (Arising Out Of S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 759 Of 1999) | 12-05-1999
K.T. Thomas, J.
Leave granted.
2. This is a case where appellants have been convicted by the trial Court of the offense under Section 392 read with Section 397 and each of them was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. They filed an appeal before the High Court of Gujarat and moved for suspension of sentence, but that was not allowed. At a later stage they again moved for suspension of sentence and that too was dismissed by the impugned order. Unfortunately, when they made a motion for having their appeal expedited that also was declined by the High Court on the premise that the High Court is having older appeals on the board.
3. When a conviction person is sentenced to fixed period of sentence and when he files appeals under any statutory right, suspension of sentence can be considered by the appellate court liberally unless there are exceptional circumstances. Of course if there is any statutory restriction against suspension of sentence it is a different matter. Similarly, when the sentence is life imprisonment the consideration for suspension of sentence could be of a different approach. But if for any reason the sentence of limited duration cannot be suspended every endeavour should be made to dispose of the appeal on merits more so when motion for expeditious hearing the appeal is made in such cases. Otherwise the very valuable right of appeal would be an exercise in futility by efflux of time. When the appellate court finds that due to practical reasons such appeals cannot be disposed of expeditiously the appellate court must bestow special concern in the matter of suspending the sentence. So as to make the appeal right meaningful and effective. Of course appellate courts can impose similar conditions when bail is granted.
4. In this case as the High Court was not inclined to hear the appeal expeditiously we are of the view that the sentence passed on appellants can be suspended on some stringent conditions. We, therefore, suspend the sentence and direct the appellants to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Nadiad. We direct the appellants to report to Kapadwang Police Station on all Mondays and Thursdays between 4.00 p.m. and 6.00 p.m. until disposal of the appeal pending before the High Court.
This appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
Advocates List
For the Appellants - Mr. Aseem Mehrotra and Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Advocates. For the Respondent - Ms. Hemantika Wahi and Mrs. Farah Sultana, Advocates.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.T. THOMAS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.B. SHAH
Eq Citation
[1999] 3 SCR 545
1999 (2) ACR 1508 (SC)
1999 (2) KLJ 498
(1999) 4 SCC 421
AIR 1999 SC 1859
1999 CRILJ 2568
1999 (3) CRIMES 54 (SC)
1999 (2) CTC 577
1999 (1) ALD (CRL) 908
1999 (2) RCR (CRIMINAL) 770
JT 1999 (4) SC 1
1999 (3) SCALE 539
LQ/SC/1999/557
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Art. 136 — Bail — Bail in criminal appeal — Appeal against conviction — Appellants convicted under Ss. 392/397 IPC and sentenced to 10 yrs' RI — Appeal moved before High Court — Suspension of sentence not granted — Appeal not expedited — Appellants directed to report to Police Station on all Mondays and Thursdays between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. until disposal of appeal pending before High Court — Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 392/397