Anita Sabharwal
v.
Anil Sabharwal
(Supreme Court Of India)
Civil Appeal No. 710 Of 1995 | 20-01-1995
1. A divorce petition being HMA Case No. 863 of 1994 preferred by the respondent-husband was pending in the Court of Shri A. K. Pathak, Additional District Judge, Delhi. The instant transfer petition was moved by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of the said case to the Family Court, Mumbai. During the pendency of the transfer petition, parties as well as their counsel had on 9-9-1996 put on record a compromise deed wherein they have agreed to get divorce by mutual consent. Strictly speaking, the preconditions of such claim have not been laid inasmuch as a petition to that effect has not been filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ( the) before the first matrimonial court, and that the statutory period of 6 months has not even commenced. Be that as it may, it stands established beyond doubt on our summoning of the original file - HMA Case No. 863 of 1994 - that the parties were married about 14 years ago, have spent the prime of their life in acrimony and litigating and that it is time that their mutuality bears some fruit in putting them apart. Therefore, we take the divorce petition in HMA Case No. 863 of 1994 on our own file and import thereto the compromise deed put on record by the parties jointly. In terms therewith, a sum of Rs 7 lakhs stands paid to the wife by means of separate bank drafts of Rs 2 lakbs, Rs 2 lakhs and Rs 3 lakhs. Recurring provision has been made therein for their childrens education and visitation a rights of the father. We have questioned the parties and they are eager to dissolve the matrimonial tie so that they can rearrange their lives well in time. We, therefore, in the spirit of Section 13-B of the Act, and in view of the fact that all hopes to unite them together have gone, hereby grant to the parties divorce by a decree of dissolution by mutual consent to end their prolonged unhappiness. Ordered accordingly.
2.The transfer petition stands disposed of2. File of HMA Case No. 863 of 1994 be sent back to the court concerned, as decided.
2.The transfer petition stands disposed of2. File of HMA Case No. 863 of 1994 be sent back to the court concerned, as decided.
Advocates List
For
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE M. M. PUNCHI
HON'BLE JUSTICE K.T. THOMAS
Eq Citation
(1997) 11 SCC 490
LQ/SC/1995/134
HeadNote
Family and Personal Laws — Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Ss. 13-B and 13-B(2)(a) — Divorce by mutual consent — Preconditions for — Preconditions not laid — However, parties married about 14 years ago, spent prime of their life in acrimony and litigating — All hopes to unite them together gone — Divorce by mutual consent granted — Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Ss. 13-B and 13-B(2)(a)
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.