All India Judges Assocn. And Others Vs. Union Of India And Others On 08 February, 2001

Q: Q. What are the equivalent citations for All India Judges Assocn. and Others vs Union of India and Others ?

The equivalence citation are2002 (2) SLJ 480 (SC) ; 2002 (2) SCT 735 (SC) ; [2002] 2 SCR 712 ; 2002 (5) BOMCR 242 ; (2002) 4 SCC 247 ; AIR 2002 SC 1752 ; 2002 (93) FLR 628 ; (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1246 ; 2002 (2) JCR 248 (SC) ; 2002 (3) ALD 39 (SC) ; 2002 (2) BLJR 1144 ; (2002) 3 GLR 2017 ; JT 2002 (3) SC 503 ; 2002 (4) ALT 41 (SC) ; 2001 (2) SCALE 327 ; LQ/SC/2001/358 ;

Q: Q. What was the bench assigned for the case All India Judges Assocn. and Others vs Union of India and Others?

HONBLE JUSTICE DR. A. S. ANAND (CJI), HONBLE JUSTICE B. N. KIRPAL, HONBLE JUSTICE S. P. BHARUCHA

Open iDraf

All India Judges Assocn. And Others v. Union Of India And Others

All India Judges Assocn. And Others
v.
Union Of India And Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1022 Of 1989 | 08-02-2001

We have heard Mr. F. S. Nariman, learned Senior who appears as amicus curiae as also Mr. Altaf Ahmad, learned Addl. Solicitor General, Justice Shetty Commission has made various recommendations, including recommendations to ameliorate service conditions of the subordinate judiciary. Certain suggestions have been made by Mr. Nariman in that behalf in the Court which have been taken note of by the learned Addl. Solicitor General. Post this matter for hearing on 27th March, 2001. In the first instance, we shall hear the parties on the question of ameliorating service conditions of subordinate judiciary. The learned Addl. Solicitor General shall inform the Court on the next date with regard to feasibility of making available funds, as suggested by Justice Shetty Commission and its distribution amongst various States for that purpose.

In so far as the assurance of the Union of India to issue a Notification regarding service conditions of staff are concerned, in view of the orders made by us earlier, that Notification is no longer necessary to be issued.

We expect all the States/Union Territories to respond to the suggestions made by Mr. Nariman in Court today with regard to matching grants to be given by the concerned States/Union Territories towards amelioration of service conditions of subordinate judiciary.

Advocates List

For

Bench List

HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. A. S. ANAND (CJI)

HON'BLE JUSTICE B. N. KIRPAL

HON'BLE JUSTICE S. P. BHARUCHA

Eq Citation

2002 (2) SLJ 480 (SC)

2002 (2) SCT 735 (SC)

[2002] 2 SCR 712

2002 (5) BOMCR 242

(2002) 4 SCC 247

AIR 2002 SC 1752

2002 (93) FLR 628

(2002) 2 UPLBEC 1246

2002 (2) JCR 248 (SC)

2002 (3) ALD 39 (SC)

2002 (2) BLJR 1144

(2002) 3 GLR 2017

JT 2002 (3) SC 503

2002 (4) ALT 41 (SC)

2001 (2) SCALE 327

LQ/SC/2001/358

HeadNote

Constitution of India — Arts. 233 to 235 and Preamble and Sch. VII List III Entry 14 — Subordinate judiciary — Service conditions — Justice Shetty Commission recommendations — Implementation of — Directions issued — Constitution of India, Art. 233 to 235 Sch. VII List III Entry 14